The other night in my theory class a student did a presentation on Heinz Kohut's theories around narcissism and, to illustrate the concept, showed a clip from YouTube of a blogger called The Narcissist. It was basically just some guy's video blog. He talked about his new haircut and how he had some emails that had piled up that he needed to respond to. It was a pretty typically boring blog entry, done through video.
Everyone in my class jumped on it, calling him completely narcissistic. They were aghast at the concept of a person putting their whole life and their thoughts on the internet for anyone to read. How full of himself he must be, they practically shouted, he's an absolute narcissist!
I sat quietly, a vague smirk on my face. Being a blogger and being vaguely part of some kind of blogging community, I have a different idea of it all I guess. Of course it's completely self-absorbed and narcissistic in a sense but I don't think that's all it is.
The DSM IV classifies Narcissistic Personality Disorder in the following manner:
Diagnostic criteria for 301.81 Narcissistic Personality Disorder
A pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasty or behavior), need for admiration, and lack of empathy, beginning in early adulthood and present in a variety of contexts, as indicated by five (or more) of the following:
(1) has a grandiose sense of self-importance (e.g., exaggerates achievements and talents, expects to be recognized as superior without commensurate achievements)
(2) is preoccupied with fantasties of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love
(3) believes that he or she is "special" and unique and can only be understood by, or should associate with, other special or high-status people (or institutions)
(4) requires excessive admiration
(5) has a sense of entitlement, i.e., takes advantage of others to achieve his or her own ends
(6) is interpersonally exploitative, i.e., takes advantage of others to achieve his or her own ends
(7) lacks empathy: is unwilling to recognize or indentify with the feelings and needs of others
(8) is often envious of others or believes that others are envious of him or her
(9) shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes
On Thanksgiving I had a conversation with my friends Jake & George about memoir writing and the self-absorbed nature of the genre. It ties right in with everything I've been talking about above. Both Jake & George are fiction writers and Jake, who was leading the discussion in some sense, began to stumble around a question he was trying to pose about memoir writing and I could tell that he wanted to ask if I thought it was self-indulgent but that he was afraid to ask, lest he offend me. It's COMPLETELY self-indulgent, I declared before he could stumble any further. He looked relieved.
And it is. I know that. I've been writing "creative nonfiction" for years now. Writing and writing and writing about myself and my life. And I don't really know what to say besides the fact that it's the only way in which I find that I can truly explore myself and my world and how I feel about it all. I've never had the impulse to write fiction. Why make things up when there's so much material sitting right in your own lap? I guess it just becomes narcissistic when you start putting it all out there for everyone to read.
Yesterday, I read a NY Times review of Donald Antrim's The Afterlife in which the reviewer says about memoir writing:
The cultural imperative to confess, to share, to work through our troubles in public — in print, on television, in a blog — has had the effect of eroding the Tolstoyan entitlement to unique suffering, an ideal that it is the prerogative of literature to defend.
Which is not easy, since even the most powerful and memorable memoirs — Joan Didion's "Year of Magical Thinking," say, or Dave Eggers's "Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius" — pass through the banality of common experience on their way to the higher ground of privileged insight. It's a thorny, boggy path, on which attributes like honesty and sincerity are indispensable (just ask James Frey) but also insufficient (just ask everyone else). The application of a skeptical intelligence or a pretty prose style to the raw material of real life can be an enticement to readers, but also a distraction, an evasion of the stark, suspicious questions that hover unspoken between author and audience. How is this any of your business? Why are you telling me this? And so, in a way that novels rarely are, memoirs are governed — and frequently constricted — by considerations of tact. The writer must judge how much the readers really want to know, and also assess how much exposure, of self and others, is appropriate.
Tact. How much to tell your readers. How much to disclose about yourself. The other night a friend expressed concern about being written about here and I assured him that he would not be. There is so much that I don't write about here, I said. I have a specific subject that I attempt to stick to: my parent's deaths and the written exploration thereof.
It's a fine line I walk. Using my own life as a creative subject. But really, I think we all use our own lives as creative subjects. Whether we mask ourselves in fictional characters or flourishes of paint, we cannot help but be there, somewhere.